California

Alliance

for

    advocating with and on behalf of people with developmental and other disabilities and their families
  Inclusive Communities, Inc.    
 
  Home Up Contents Feedback Search

Home
Up
Who We Are
Values
History
Contribute
Your Legislator
Community Imperative

CAIC UPDATE

Budget Act of 2005 Signed into Law

Major Items from Schwarzenegger 2005-2006 Budget Proposal Affecting People with Developmental Disabilities

SSI/SSP - Stinging Defeat for People with Disabilities

The January 2006 and January 2007 State COLA ELIMINATED - The Governor proposed eliminating the January 1, 2006 state COLA (4.6%) and to absorb the January 1, 2006 federal COLA (2.3%) into the General Fund. The Legislature compromised with the Governor, agreeing to delay the Federal COLA by three months in both 2006 and 2007, and ELIMINATE the state COLA in BOTH 2006 and 2007. The January 2006 and January 2007 state COLA's would not be re-instated at any point. They are simply eliminated. On April 1, 2006 the Federal COLA will raise the individual grant from $812 to $827/month, and raise the couple's grant from $1,437 to $1459/month.


In Home Supportive Services (IHSS) - Major Victory

IHSS Wages Holding Firm - The Governor proposed lowering the hourly wage of already low paid home care workers (wages vary between $6.75 and $10.50/hr.). This would have driven these members of the working poor further into poverty, it would have returned California to the time when people with disabilities were forced into institutions or left to cope in dangerous or degrading situations because they were unable to find home care workers willing to work for near minimum wage. Democrats in the Legislature held firm in protecting IHSS wages. The budget contains no decreases, and the maximum wage for IHSS workers that the state will contribute towards was increased from $10.10 to $11.10/hour.

Background - IHSS wages are split between the federal government (50%), the state (35%), and the county (15%), up until $11.10/hour (above that level the state will not pay their 35%, and the county has to share the cost with the feds 50/50).. Workers negotiate with the county for wages and benefits, but the county only pays 15% of any increase they agree to. Under the Governor's proposal, the state would have continued to contribute their 35% up to California's minimum wage ($6.75/hour), but would not contribute to wages beyond the minimum wage. Therefore counties would have had to pay 50% of any wages above $6.75/hour, over a three fold increase. Cash strapped counties would likely have respond by rolling back wages.

Developmental Services

Holding Our Ground on Budget and Self-Direction Moves Forward


Temporary Budget Cuts from 2004-2005 Continued – Temporary budget cuts from the last two years have created enormous stresses on the provider community and reduced the availability of services to people. The following cuts will remain in place: (1) Rate freezes for Day Program, contract services, and Community Care Facilities. (2) Elimination of the SSI/SSP pass-through. (3) Delay in intake and assessment from 60 to 120 days. (4) Elimination of start-up funds (except for people exiting developmental centers). (5) Unallocated reduction in Regional Center Operations of $6.5 million. (6) Unallocated reduction in the Purchase of Services budget of $7 million.

Legislature Gives Authority for the Self Directed Services Waiver - Regulations will be developed with community input - Earliest date of implementation July 2006 - Will be available statewide for up to 9,000 people. DDS is applying for a federal waiver for self-directed services. This would authorized regional centers to give families and consumers individual budgets over which they will have substantial control for purchasing services and supports. A person's individual budget will be calculated as 90% of their historic purchase of service (POS) costs or 90% of the average cost of people with similar disabilities and living situation, whichever is larger. The other 10% will be allocated by putting 5% to a risk pool and 5% savings for the state.

This program will be available in ALL regional Centers when implemented and serve as many as 9,000 people after three years. It is fully voluntary. People will decide to enroll in self-direction based on the size of their individual budget and personal preference for gaining greater control over their services and supports. This proposal was controversial with many advocates supporting and many opposing the proposal. Advocates will continue to weigh in as regulations are developed during the next six to nine months. A separate report on self-direction will be posted later.

Legislature Authorizes Funds for 2005/2006 Closure Costs of Agnews Developmental Center - The Schwarzenegger Administration has submitted to the Legislature a plan to close Agnews Developmental Center by July of 2007. The state plans to move 80% of Agnews' 350 residents to community living arrangements. In order to ensure quality of community services the state will:

• Establish a permanent stock of housing dedicated to serve individuals with developmental disabilities.
• Establish new residential models by expanding the Adult Family Home Agency to include the ‘Family Teaching Model’ and by establishing a residential pilot project for adults with special health care and intensive support needs.
• Utilize Agnews’ employees on a transitional basis (up to 4 years) in community settings to augment and enhance services including health care, clinical services and quality assurance.
• Implement a Quality Management system under a federal grant that focuses on assuring that quality services and supports are available prior to, during, and after transition of each person leaving Agnews.

Long Term "Common Sense" Cost Containment Strategies - Defeated -

The Administration recognizes that rate freezes and suspension of start-up funding cannot be made permanent. They are therefore looking for long-term strategies to reduce the growth in the community services budget. The last three years, the Davis and Schwarzenegger Administrations proposed Statewide Purchase of Service Standards, and they were defeated each year. This year the Schwarzenegger Administration has apparently abandoned the POS Standards, but they introduced legislation (trailer bill language) to codify some of the cost savings ideas from the old POS Standards proposal. ALL of the following cost containment proposals were DEFEATED:

(1) Require regional centers to use the least costly vendor who can meet the consumer's needs, as identified in the IPP. When choosing a day program the regional center shall consider the combined cost of transportation and program.

(2) For consumers age 0-17 years, regional centers shall consider the family's responsibility for purchasing services for a non-disabled child.

(3) Regional centers shall give preference to purchasing services using a group modality in lieu of an individual intervention, if the consumers needs can be met by the group modality. This appears to apply to behavioral supports, social/recreational activities, and non-medical therapies.

(4) Regional centers shall provide annual reports to consumers/families listing the type, amount and cost of services purchased on their behalf in that year. The idea is that consumers will be able to check to make sure they have received all the services regional center has been billed for.

(5) Internal regional center procedures to ensure that purchases comply with laws and regulations, such as the requirement to first use generic (non-regional center funded) services.

(6) Review by a regional center clinician for all requests to purchase (a) supplemental program staffing, (b) assistive technology and environmental adaptation, (c) behavioral services, (d) specialized medical or dental services, and (e) therapeutic services. The review shall ensure that the proposed purchase is clinically appropriate with respect to the type, amount, durations and scope needed to meet the individual's IPP or IFSP.

Medi-Cal Redesign - Proposals Affecting People With Disabilities Largely Rejected

Managed Care Expansion - Proposal Scaled Back - The Governor proposed that participants in Medi-Cal who are aged, blind, or disabled, will be required to enroll in managed care plans, where those plans are available (mostly urban and suburban areas), and would have required the expansion of managed care to new counties. The Legislature authorized expansion of managed care to up to 13 new counties, but only at the consent of the county; and would involve aged, bind, or disabled in up to seven additional counties (Marin, Mendocino, San Benito, San Louis Obispo, Sonoma, Ventura, and possibly Lake, but only with consent of county and stakeholders.

Dental Benefit Limit - Compromise - The Governor proposed a yearly benefit limit of $1,000 for dental services for adults, excluding federally mandated emergency services. The Legislature authorized a limit of $1,800/year.

Benefit Cost Sharing - Defeated - The Governor proposed a Medi-Cal monthly premiums of $10 for an adult, $4 for a child, with a maximum premium of $27/family per month. This would have applied to roughly 90,000 seniors and people with disabilities and families with incomes above the SSI/SSP level ($1,006/mo. for an individual and $1,339 for a couple) and 460,000 children and family members above the Federal Poverty Level ($1,306/mo. for a family of three).

Acute and Long-Term Care Integration Plans - Defeated for Now - As a way to encourage care delivery in the least restrictive setting possible, Medi-Cal will create Acute and Long-Term Care Integration plans in three counties to provide integrated Medi-Cal and Medicare services to seniors and people with disabilities. This was an attempt, among other things, to privatize and bypass IHSS Public Authorities, possibly becoming a back door way to reduce IHSS worker wages. This will be re-introduced by the Administration as legislation.
 

Contact us at:
info@caic.org
415 664-0167

Send mail to info@caic.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 09/13/08